COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80648I75820K
IntelBX8071513400F
▲ 669,881 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

VS
▲ 922,566 ▼

10 Cores, 16 Threads @2.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q1 2023.

Effective Speed 
+37%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,019 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 301st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
8,325 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		76.8 % 106 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
Average Score 
+73%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		86.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6% 		81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		96.3 Pts 185 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+92%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		192 Pts 368 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+92%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		364 Pts 693 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+90%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		594 Pts 1,162 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+96%
Overclocked Score 
+49%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		94 Pts +4% 90.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		120 Pts 192 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+60%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts 384 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+62%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		462 Pts 747 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+62%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		737 Pts 1,233 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+67%
Value & Sentiment 
+114%
Market Share
Based on 69,049,088 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.13 % 0.66 % Hugely higher market share.
+408%
Value
Value For Money 		94.7 % 122 % Better value.
+29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		66 % 92 % Much more popular.
+39%
Price
Price (score) 		$130 Cheaper.
+20% 		$163
Nice To Haves 
+54%
Age
Newest 		123 Months 22 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		140 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 10 cores Much higher core count.
+67%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+55%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.3 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+32% 		2.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.6 GHz 4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+28%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		933 Pts 1,677 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+80%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		748 Pts 1,635 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+119%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell-E Raptor Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA2011-V3 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 76.8%
Average Bench 106%

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
101,694
8,325
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback