IntelBX8071513400F
AMD100-100000514WOF

10 Cores, 16 Threads @2.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q1 2023.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 3,407 user samples
2,450 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 1420
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
957 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 121% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 107% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 107% Great: 121%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 1420
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
106 % 114 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
84 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
78.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
182 Pts 209 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
360 Pts 413 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
681 Pts 808 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+19%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1124 Pts 1505 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+34%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.2 Pts +2% 89.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
191 Pts 215 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+13%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
377 Pts 432 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
700 Pts 864 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+23%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1203 Pts 1699 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+41%
Market Share
Based on 64,577,383 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.46 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,433%
0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
114 % Better value.
+19%
95.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % Much more popular.
+49%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$207 Much cheaper.
+61%
$530
Age
Newest
9 Months More recent.
+25%
12 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
10 cores 16 cores Much higher core count.
+60%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm 5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.5 GHz 4.5 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+80%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz 5.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1661 Pts 3995 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+141%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1591 Pts 3466 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+118%
Series
CPU Architecture
Raptor Lake Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2
ADVERTISEMENT

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2023 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $316Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $28
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $399Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback