UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i3-13100F

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX8071513100F

BUY • $110

AMD

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 3,566 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

997 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 101% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)

Poor: 90% Great: 101%

SPEED RANK: 104^th / 1442

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

2,569 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg)

Poor: 47% Great: 92%

SPEED RANK: 359^th / 1442

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 70%

Battle cruiser


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		96 %	Much faster effective speed. +33%		72 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	83.2 Pts	Lower memory latency. +21%	68.9 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	179 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +69%	106 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	335 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +63%	206 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	589 Pts	Much faster quad-core speed. +46%	403 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	828 Pts	Faster octa-core speed. +18%	699 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	91.2 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +11%	82.1 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	186 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +29%	144 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	361 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +26%	286 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	667 Pts	Faster OC quad-core speed. +20%	558 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	864 Pts		999 Pts	Faster OC octa-core speed. +16%

Market Share

Based on 67,765,268 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)		0.07 %	Hugely higher market share. +600%		0.01 %
User Rating UBM User Rating		88 %	Much more popular. +63%		54 %


Age Newest	15 Months	Much more recent. +69%	49+ Months
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	866 Pts		1326 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +53%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	832 Pts		1007 Pts	Faster 64-core speed. +21%

The Raptor Lake Intel i3-13100F is practically identical to its predecessor, the 12100F. They both feature four hyper-threaded Golden Cove P-cores. The only differences are a 100 MHz base and a 200 MHz boost clock increase which result in a 2% effective speed improvement. With an MSRP of $110 USD, The i3-13100F is the obvious choice for entry level gaming builds. It offers performance that almost matches the previous generations, higher tier, i5-12400F. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. ^{[Jan '23 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. ^{[Mar '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback