Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO B760M-P DDR4 (MS-7E02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E02
MotherboardMSI PRO B760M-P DDR4 (MS-7E02)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 21:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 180
2-Core 319
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 830
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$309
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 168
Parallax 162
142% 168 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 133
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 CORE XT 1TB
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,276
Write 515
Mixed 137
138% 643 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 2.6
116% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 197
287% 542 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 451%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 2560 1369 HKC2736 27E6QC
Typical PRO B760M-P DDR4 (MS-7E02) Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO B760M-P DDR4 (MS-7E02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback