COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80768285K
IntelBX8071512100F
▲ 52544 ▼

24 Cores, 24 Threads @3.7GHz, Arrow Lake.
Release date: Q4 2024.

VS
▲ 927,849 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 11,882 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
22 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 135% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 107% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 107% Great: 135%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
11,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 135th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		121 % Faster effective speed.
+29% 		94.1 %
Average Score 
+54%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		55.2 Pts 83.8 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+52%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		236 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+37% 		172 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		497 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+54% 		323 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		993 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+76% 		565 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		2,016 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+156% 		788 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+65%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		73.6 Pts 91 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+24%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		278 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+56% 		178 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		555 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+61% 		344 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		1,100 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+70% 		647 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		2,146 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+161% 		823 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+328%
Market Share
Based on 69,047,169 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.03 % 0.36 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,100%
Value
Value For Money 		93.1 % 135 % Much better value.
+45%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 92 % Much more popular.
+77%
Price
Price (score) 		$721 $75 Hugely cheaper.
+90%
Nice To Haves 
+216%
Age
Newest 		0 Months Hugely more recent.
+100% 		34 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		24 cores Hugely higher core count.
+500% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		3 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+70% 		10 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12% 		3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.7 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+33% 		4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		5,357 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+547% 		828 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		5,075 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+538% 		795 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Arrow Lake Alder Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1851 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		4Xe None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 121%
Average Bench 94.1%

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best-case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new chiplet-based design results in around 90 ns of memory latency, compared to around 60 ns on Intel’s 12th, 13th and 14th generations. Consequently, gaming performance on the 200 series (like AMD Ryzen) is susceptible to frame drops. Meanwhile, Intel’s 13600K and 14600K continue to offer almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more money on a gaming CPU is normally a waste of money as games are rarely CPU bound under real-world conditions. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now faces the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Oct '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
22
11,860
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback