IntelBX80768285K
IntelBX8071514600K

24 Cores, 24 Threads @3.7GHz, Arrow Lake.
Release date: Q4 2024.

14 Cores, 20 Threads @3.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q4 2023.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 3,503 user samples
160 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 142% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 100% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 100% Great: 142%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
3,343 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 117% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 117% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
121 % 124 % +2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
60.3 Pts 83.1 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+38%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
251 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
219 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
515 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
440 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
968 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+10%
877 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,931 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+27%
1,526 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
84.6 Pts 92 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
289 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+28%
225 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
567 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26%
451 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
1,109 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+23%
899 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
2,204 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+39%
1,588 Pts
Market Share
Based on 70,572,307 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.43 % 0.45 % +5%
Value
Value For Money
96 % 129 % Much better value.
+35%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % 97 % Much more popular.
+76%
Price
Price (score)
€580 €212 Much cheaper.
+63%
Age
Newest
8 Months Much more recent.
+60%
20 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
24 cores Much higher core count.
+71%
14 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads Higher thread count.
+20%
20 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
3 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+70%
10 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
5.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
5,348 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+102%
2,647 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
4,927 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+95%
2,532 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Arrow Lake Raptor Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1851 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
4Xe UHD 770

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best-case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new chiplet-based design results in around 90 ns of memory latency, compared to around 60 ns on Intel’s 12th, 13th and 14th generations. Consequently, gaming performance on the 200 series (like AMD Ryzen) is susceptible to frame drops. Meanwhile, Intel’s 13600K and 14600K continue to offer almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more money on a gaming CPU is normally a waste of money as games are rarely CPU bound under real-world conditions. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now faces the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Oct '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Excellent value CPU, great for gaming, does everything quick fast and in a hurry. Decent headroom as well, mine matches the average bench of i7-14700k on this site (130%) with only a very minor overclock. Even the i9-14900k only averages 131%. It's hard for me to understand why users buy those two way-overpriced CPUs in lieu of this beast. I haven't even tried using higher OC settings--there's absolutely no need at this point in time. Perhaps in 5 years or so I'll revisit that statement. All things considered, the 14600k earns a strong 'recommend' after a full year of use. [Feb '25 mke1jrs]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2025 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmarks by technical masters

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation. More »
Why does UserBenchmark need so many captchas?
Our servers must handle malicious traffic because our user-focused service leads to less profit for brands. More »
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products. More »
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. More »
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 15 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K €178Nvidia RTX 4060 €308WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB €153
Intel Core i5-14600K €212Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti €441WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB €107
Intel Core i5-12400F €108Nvidia RTX 4070 €568Crucial T700 M.2 4TB €432
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback