Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80768265K
IntelBX8071512100F

20 Cores, 20 Threads @3.9GHz, Arrow Lake.
Release date: Q4 2024.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 11,878 user samples
18 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 132% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 110% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 110% Great: 132%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
11,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 135th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
123 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
94.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
57.9 Pts 83.8 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+45%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
234 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+36%
172 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
489 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+51%
323 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
1004 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+78%
565 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1989 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+152%
788 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
75.5 Pts 91 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+21%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
280 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+57%
178 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
535 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+56%
344 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
1061 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+64%
647 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
2119 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+157%
823 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,887,061 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.33 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,550%
Value
Value For Money
112 % 132 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 92 % Hugely more popular.
+84%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $80 Hugely cheaper.
+80%
Age
Newest
0 Months Hugely more recent.
+100%
33 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
20 cores Hugely higher core count.
+400%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
20 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+150%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
3 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+70%
10 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.9 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18%
3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+28%
4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
4456 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+438%
828 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
4299 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+441%
795 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Arrow Lake Alder Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1851 FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
4Xe None

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new architecture appears to have notably higher memory latency than previous generations. Intel’s 12th and 13th generation CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. [Oct '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Gaming is more accessible with the i3-12100F: Intel’s entry level Alder Lake desktop processor. Higher end Alder Lake processors feature a combination of performance and efficiency cores, however, the 12100F contains just four hyper-threaded Golden Cove performance cores. It has a max boost frequency of 4.3 GHz, 12 MB of L3 cache and a 58W TDP. The 12100F is keenly priced at around $130 USD and needs to be paired with a new chipset such as the B660. Only users with discrete GPUs should consider “F” models as they do not have integrated graphics. Whilst a budget PC built around the 12100F represents unbeatable value for money, the 6-core i5-12400F, with 50% stronger multi-core, is a better option for gamers with 3060+ tier GPUs. AMD do not have any CPUs competing in this price segment. Entry level gamers, who cannot find reasonably priced discrete GPUs, could consider the similarly performing Ryzen 5 5600G APU which has integrated RX Vega graphics that are around three times faster than Intel's UHD 730. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback