COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000589WOF
IntelBX80637I73770
$297
▲ 59658 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
▲ 585,044 ▼
 $297 

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.4GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q1 2012.

Effective Speed 
+65%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 282,752 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
4,545 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 126% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 126%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
278,207 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 57% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 57% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 431st / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		113 % Much faster effective speed.
+65% 		69 %
Average Score 
+133%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		80.9 Pts 83 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		208 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+128% 		91.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		406 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+133% 		174 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		780 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+161% 		299 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1509 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+246% 		436 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+126%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		93.2 Pts +0% 93.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		219 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+117% 		101 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		433 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+119% 		198 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		862 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+150% 		345 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1706 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+243% 		497 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+48%
Market Share
Based on 67,987,858 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.17 % 0.59 % Hugely higher market share.
+247%
Value
Value For Money 		109 % Much better value.
+61% 		67.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		59 % +2% 58 %
Price
Price (score) 		$320 $297 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
Nice To Haves 
+177%
Age
Newest 		20 Months Hugely more recent.
+86% 		147 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		170 Watts 77 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+55%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+77% 		22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38% 		3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+44% 		3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2989 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+500% 		498 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2720 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+506% 		449 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen4 Ivy Bridge
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 FCLGA1155
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 HD 4000
Conclusion 
Average Bench 113%
Average Bench 69%
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-3770 is an Ivy Bridge processor. With four cores and eight threads the 3770 has excellent single , dual and multi-core performance. Comparing the 3770 to the 4770K shows that the 4770K leads by 11% at stock speeds and, thanks to an unlocked multiplier on the 4770K, by 15% at overclocked frequencies. The i7-3770 has a very strong performance profile which includes multi-core capabilities that are likely to be overkill for the majority of desktop users. Comparing the 3770 to the 3770K shows that the unlocked 3770K allows for, on average, an additional 8% increase in performance. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
4,545
278,207
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback