AMD100-100000023BOX
IntelBX80684I59600K
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 280 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+20%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps 110 EFps +5%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps 135 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+9%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+6%
133 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 271,829 user samples
108,274 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1258
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
163,555 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 83% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 83% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1258
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
88.2 % 95 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.1 Pts 92.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+18%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
136 Pts +1% 135 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
270 Pts +0% 269 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
526 Pts 528 Pts +0%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
1028 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+36%
758 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.3 Pts 97.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
145 Pts 152 Pts +5%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
287 Pts 305 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+6%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
562 Pts 608 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1099 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+24%
883 Pts
Market Share
Based on 31,796,699 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.57 % Higher market share.
+27%
1.24 %
Value
Value For Money
78.2 % 105 % Much better value.
+34%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % 217 % Much more popular.
+66%
Price
Price (score)
$430 $192 Much cheaper.
+55%
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+38%
21 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz +3% 3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz 4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
2282 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+158%
886 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
2115 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+176%
765 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Coffee Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1151
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which can impact gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The hex-core i5-9600K is third in Intel’s line-up of 9th generation Coffee Lake CPUs. It has a TDP of 95W and requires an aftermarket cooler (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400). The 9600K was designed to be overclocked. Once this is enabled in the BIOS (requires a Z-series motherboard), the 9600K runs 10% faster. In terms of performance, the i5-9600K is almost unbeatable for desktop users and it has sufficient multi-core performance to handle all but the most demanding workstation tasks. For CPU encoding (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake etc.) the Ryzen 3000 series offers great 64-core performance. For example the overclocked Ryzen 3600 is approximately 13% worse for gaming, desktop and normal consumer workloads but it is 27% faster for 64-core processing. CPU encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn, encoding tasks are far better performed by dedicated hardware such an NVENC or QuickSync. At stock clocks the i5-9600K is around 8% slower than Intel’s flagship i9-9900K but when both are overclocked, the 9600K closes the gaming gap to within two or three percent. Considering that the 9900K is the fastest gaming processor available, and almost twice the price of the 9600K, this is no small feat. The i5-9600K is aimed squarely at gamers who are not willing to compromise on performance but don't want to pay more than they need to. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback