COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000591WOF
AMD
▲ 701,655 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
▲ 53231 ▼
  

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2020.

Effective Speed 
+51%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 6,913 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
5,382 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 93% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 93% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
1,531 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 324th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		112 % Much faster effective speed.
+51% 		74.3 %
Average Score 
+67%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+18% 		69 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		207 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+77% 		117 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		399 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+71% 		234 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		764 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+79% 		428 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1369 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+92% 		713 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+40%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		90.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12% 		81.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		217 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+45% 		150 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		430 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+44% 		298 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		849 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+45% 		584 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1616 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+52% 		1065 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+166%
Market Share
Based on 68,051,792 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.04 % Hugely higher market share.
+300% 		0.01 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		70 % Much more popular.
+32% 		53 %
Nice To Haves 
+63%
Age
Newest 		20 Months Much more recent.
+58% 		48+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1975 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+38% 		1429 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1895 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+92% 		988 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 112%
Average Bench 74.3%
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Ryzen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
5,382
1,531
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback