AMD100-000000098
Intel
$393
  

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2020.

 $393 

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.8GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 65,756 user samples
26,507 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
39,249 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 30% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 30% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 805th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
74.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
50.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
71.4 Pts 73.2 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
113 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+77%
63.9 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
216 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+98%
109 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
414 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+162%
158 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
697 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+328%
163 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
81.8 Pts 90.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
144 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+71%
84 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
287 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+104%
141 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
566 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+173%
207 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1061 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+415%
206 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,124,536 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % Hugely higher market share.
+120%
0.05 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % More popular.
+13%
52 %
Age
Newest
52+ Months Much more recent.
+60%
129 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1470 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+610%
207 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
972 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+493%
164 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel i7-4500U is a dual core, four thread 4th generation Haswell ultrabook processor. Its most impressive feature is a TDP of 15 Watts which typically yields over five hours of battery life. Despite the i7-4500Us relatively low effective speed of 66 (compared to the average of the leaders), the i7-4500U is perfectly adequate for handling the majority of day to day computing tasks, but it will struggle to deliver on CPU intensive tasks such as video editing and CAD. Gamers should obviously look elsewhere as despite the impressive desktop performance of the integrated HD 4400 graphics, 3D performance is far from adequate for modern games. If the battery life is a priority, then downgrading to the cheaper i5-4200U will deliver 15% more life but comparing the 4500U and 4200U shows that the 4500U is around 17% faster. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback