Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000071BOX
AMD100-100000514WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 637,927 user samples
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 191st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
2,508 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 125% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 106% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 106% Great: 125%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.9 % 114 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
20 % Control 23%, SpiderM 1%, CPunk 8%, RiftB 34%, TWarTroy 37%, F122 26%, DoomE 9%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
RDR2 1% 26 % Forza5 10%, AoE4 28%, Bord3 37%, FarC6 32%, WatchDL 10%, BFV 39%, CPunk 5%, EldenR 14%, Civ6 67%, CSGO 73%, DoomE 2%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
53 % FarC6 52%, FinFant14 48%, GTAV 61%, SotTR 67%, CSGO 87%, R6S 48%, TWarW3 9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.2 Pts 81.2 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
138 Pts 208 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+51%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
270 Pts 411 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+52%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
513 Pts 788 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+54%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
900 Pts 1,526 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+70%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.6 Pts 92.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
145 Pts 219 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+51%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
288 Pts 434 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+51%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
562 Pts 853 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+52%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,009 Pts 1,675 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+66%
Market Share
Based on 68,990,290 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.72 % 2.5 % Hugely higher market share.
+247%
Value
Value For Money
103 % 105 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
+46%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$146 Much cheaper.
+61%
$379
Age
Newest
64 Months 25 Months Much more recent.
+61%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 4.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+25%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 5.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+30%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,479 Pts 3,901 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+164%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,358 Pts 3,613 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+166%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback