UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs Intel Core i7-5820K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMDYD170XBCAEWOF

BUY • $211

IntelBX80648I75820K

BUY • $122

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 168,164 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

66,470 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 80% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)

Poor: 58% Great: 80%

SPEED RANK: 380^th / 1442

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

101,694 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 68% Great: 88%

SPEED RANK: 281^st / 1442

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		71 %			76.8 %	Slightly faster effective speed. +8%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	70.1 Pts		86.4 Pts	Lower memory latency. +23%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	103 Pts	Slightly faster single-core speed. +7%	96.3 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	202 Pts	Slightly faster dual-core speed. +5%	192 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	386 Pts	Slightly faster quad-core speed. +6%	364 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	674 Pts	Faster octa-core speed. +13%	594 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	79.7 Pts		94 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +18%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	116 Pts		120 Pts	+3%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	226 Pts		237 Pts	+5%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	444 Pts		462 Pts	+4%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	813 Pts	Faster OC octa-core speed. +10%	737 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,776,736 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.03 %		0.21 %	Hugely higher market share. +600%
Value Value For Money	76.6 %		96.4 %	Better value. +26%
User Rating UBM User Rating	70 %	Slightly more popular. +6%	66 %
Price Price (score)	$211		$122	Much cheaper. +42%


Age Newest	85 Months	More recent. +27%	116 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +32%	140 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	8 cores	Much higher core count. +33%	6 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	16 threads	Much higher thread count. +33%	12 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	14 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +36%	22 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.4 GHz	+3%	3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	3.8 GHz	Slightly faster turbo frequency. +6%	3.6 GHz
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1183 Pts	Faster OC 64-core speed. +27%	933 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1032 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +38%	748 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Zen	Haswell-E
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	LGA2011-V3
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn't due for release until next week but two of our users have already submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and single core scores from our samples shows a relative 4.3% boost on the single core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t fully engaged (12% turbo boost expected). These preliminary results are seriously impressive as they put Zen’s IPC between 0% and 9% below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Even in the worst case scenario these results are still impressive. Comparing Intel’s $1,000 6900K and the 1700X shows that AMD delivers comparable performance for half the price! A shake-up of the CPU market will unfold as Zen rolls out. If Ryzen CPUs can overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will likely dominate the entire market putting a very welcome end to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years. ^{[Feb '17 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers. ^{[Sep '14 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback