Average Bench: 74.5% (212th of 1276)

Based on 103,623 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Models: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor, AMD Ryzen: ZD3406BAM88F4_38/34_Y

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn't due for release until next week but two of our users has already submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and single core scores from our samples shows a relative 4.3% boost on the single core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t fully engaged (12% turbo boost expected). These preliminary results are seriously impressive as they put Zen’s IPC between 0% and 9% below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Even in the worst case scenario these results are still impressive. Comparing Intel’s $1,000 6900K and the 1700X shows that AMD delivers comparable performance for half the price! A shake-up of the CPU market will unfold as Zen rolls out. If Ryzen CPUs can overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will likely dominate the entire market putting a very welcome end to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years. [Feb '17 CPUPro]

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X averaged 25.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 1,139Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 104Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is just 14.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 744Pts
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed 404Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 103,623 samples)
Min Avg Max
66.6 Memory 73.8 81.7
95.6 1-Core 104 113
179 2-Core 205 227
73.2% 128 Pts
Min Avg Max
332 4-Core 404 450
613 8-Core 744 870
71.4% 574 Pts
Min Avg Max
988 64-Core 1,139 1,275
76.5% 1,139 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 823
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 1,172
79% 1,172 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 637
66% 519 Pts
64-Core 1,029
69% 1,029 Pts
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 69
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 194
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 665
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 1,058
71% 1,058 Pts
103,623 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,677,216 CPUs tested.

 Prices

MSRP ≈ $400 @ launch in Mar '17
EbayUS $30016 mins
AmazonUS $3207 mins
BHPhotoUS $3603 years
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen 7 1700X Builds (Compare 6,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,140

Popular Ryzen 7 1700X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Multiple architectural advances combined with platform and processing technologies...

Added 3 years ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

11 days ago.

Comment 

edged out over the 4590 turboing to 3.5ghz in floating point math by 3%. IPC is rock solid, and their version of SMT rivals intel's hyper-threading. The real battle between AMD and Intel is going to take place on the front of core count, pricing, clock speeds, and if the Athlon x2 days are any indication, perhaps even some corporate sabotage.—Feb '17

Comment 

Great value for the price, 8 cores are vey useful in a workstation and for the price this is amazing—Apr '17


Excellent

1 month ago.

Normal people dont post comments or "reviews", why would they? Only company plebs trying to sell sh** do that. Took me a few stings to figure it out. Gotta give the AMD "fanboys" 10/10 for hard work, they are all over it - HOOYA


Good

1 month ago.

Great CPU for Video Editing, Live Streaming, Rendering and still not bad for Gaming, although this CPU is not even designed for Gaming.


Poor

4 months ago.

amd cpu pay money less than intel cpu and same calculate power.


Liked

7 months ago.

Comment 

Brave new world with Ryzen..—Feb '17


Excellent

3 months ago.

Still decent performance as of February 2020. It's okay for games, although newer AMD and Intel CPU's are much greater. 8 cores are nice to have, I guess you could spit them into 4 VM's to host smaller game servers, or host 1-2 bigger game servers (such as Minecraft).


Terrible

5 months ago.

amazing price to perfomance ratio


Good

3 months ago.

Preordered this baby..cant wait to double the performance of my FX while halving the power consumption since its overclocked...


Excellent

16 months ago.

Owning one myself and just knowing the power I have under the hood is Amazing!!! Recent updates to the bios really helped performance.


Excellent

16 months ago.

cost more than his Intel's equivalent (i7), and his not even close to the i7 specs...


Good

3 years ago.


Excellent

17 months ago.

Cheap, more powerful than Intel core i5


Excellent

1 month ago.

good value for non-overclockers and content creators


Excellent

16 months ago.

Comment 

Thanks for this AMD, we needed a liberator from Intel's monopoly—Mar '17


Terrible

3 years ago.

low perfomance for that price


Average

20 months ago.

Can't beat 3 year old Intel in games. Period.


Poor

3 years ago.

low single core


Outstanding

3 years ago.

See mulicore MC float of ryzen , it is exclent Boys Game 80% work with graphic card ,only 20% on cpu , games cant show cpu real power, they use only 1 unit in cpu(not all) So All game bench , for cpu test (on sites) are wrong and fake!!!!!? So dont belive CPU games frame rate tests on sites(see above picture and other cpu game bench exactly, in high quality like 4k results same Only only CINEBENCH 15 test can test all unit,core and show real world cpu power performance https://www.instagram.com/p/BRO-v8il9EI/ #amd #ryzen #vega #intel


Excellent

2 years ago.

Got it for $185 on sale off Amazon with the rebate. Absolute steal for this kind of performance!


Excellent

1 month ago.

Review  www.amd.com/...

My 1080 sea hawk is bottlenecked even at stable overclock Way overrated for NAS systems.. except for thunderbolt limitation. Cat6 Cat7 maybe better 4k editing smooth, 5.9k editing surprisingly handled. Works best with fastest ram you can get and will push you ahead of even 2nd gen chips Best of ryzen 1st gen, great for gamers who need a work station even in 2020 as a budget build. 1600x same score except slight faster 4 core. the 8 cores makes rendering 20 minute 4k projects down to an hour with lots of graphics and transitions. I would reccomend 1st and 2nd gen for any budget built. Make sure to overclock as single core is the weak point


Good

2 years ago.

Good performance vs budget


Outstanding

3 years ago.

A monopoly-breaker, and the first of many. GG Intel


Terrible

3 years ago.

Poor quality silicone that doesn't overclock well, even crashes using XFR with a decent cooler. Cheaper R5 1600 beats it in some areas where this should excel (at least when I benched it). Gaming performance worst than 1600 due to lower OC capability. Elderly i5 4670K is superior for gaming.


Excellent

3 years ago.

I Love The New AMD CPUs


Excellent

3 years ago.

gg intel prepare yourselves company and fanboys alike for the red storm.


Excellent

24 months ago.

Amazing CPU. Got on sale for $130, and the performance is unspeakable. In cinebench, it rips up the applications with ease. For such a good value, you really can't go wrong, especially if AMD keeps supporting the AM4 socket in the future. Competition!


Excellent

23 months ago.

This CPU is a processing beast. Base clock is 3.5Ghz but I easily and comfortably overclocked mine to 4.0Ghz with only 1.375V and a better than average air cooler. Very stable workhorse at that speed and the benefits were substantial.


Outstanding

3 years ago.

very good performance for the money


Outstanding

3 years ago.

Shocking the CPU world with this dominating 8-core, AMD is back at the top of the boards.


Excellent

2 years ago.

It's a beast. First gen, but doesn't have any issues at all. Expect to be using it for the next 5 years easily.


Excellent

13 months ago.

1700X was the best option for me as it has dramatically improved sigle-thread performance (comparing to my previous CPU) that reduces the latency as well as exciting multi-thread performance I need in my everyday work. Since I do not want to mess with overclocking at home, XFR is a good option that is worth paying a bit more. Again, it helps to reduce latency and to speed up system reaction (provided that you have a good NVME SSD). Now there are some better options like 2700X or even 3400G (3700X is a way another CPU, just its name has these "700X"), but it is still a way affordable than intel solutions and unlike them has a possibility for later upgrades.


Excellent

3 years ago.

RIGHT so this average benchmark is NOT correct. The people that are getting the 80 percents have not installed the bios updates that allow the chip to go to 3.8 not 3.4 GHz (or are just very unlucky) . At 3.8 this chip will quite easily get 95 to 98 percent and will happily beat my mates overclocked i7-6700k at 4.6 GHz on 3D mark.


Excellent

3 years ago.

1700x is an overclock beast with the Taichi


Excellent

3 years ago.

I multi-task with more than 7 different cpu-demanding programs open across three monitors, and the 1700x doesn't even break a sweat.


Excellent

2 years ago.

This is CPU of new era of AMD with amazing perfomance.


Good

2 years ago.

1/4 the price for comparable performance.


Excellent

2 years ago.

Best bang for the buck I've gotten.


Your
opinion?
1276 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback