AMDYD170XBCAEWOF
AMDAD860KXBJASBX
VS
About

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.7GHz, Steamroller.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 91,901 user samples
72,709 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 1184
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
19,192 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 44% Base clock 4.3 GHz
Worst Bench: 24% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 24% Great: 44%
SPEED RANK: 425th / 1184
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.3 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+98%
37 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
105 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+56%
67.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
209 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+61%
130 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
412 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+81%
228 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
767 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+231%
232 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1161 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+400%
232 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
117 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+51%
77.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
233 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+56%
149 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
461 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+68%
274 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
897 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+225%
276 Pts
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1313 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+377%
275 Pts
Market Share
Based on 21,111,344 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.37 % Hugely higher market share.
+429%
0.07 %
Value
Value For Money
86 % Much better value.
+68%
51.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
130 % Hugely more popular.
+113%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$155 $85 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
31 Months Much more recent.
+50%
62 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
28 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 4 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Steamroller
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FM2+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn't due for release until next week but two of our users has already submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and single core scores from our samples shows a relative 4.3% boost on the single core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t fully engaged (12% turbo boost expected). These preliminary results are seriously impressive as they put Zen’s IPC between 0% and 9% below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Even in the worst case scenario these results are still impressive. Comparing Intel’s $1,000 6900K and the 1700X shows that AMD delivers comparable performance for half the price! A shake-up of the CPU market will unfold as Zen rolls out. If Ryzen CPUs can overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will likely dominate the entire market putting a very welcome end to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years. [Feb '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a quad core budget processor. Released in mid 2014, the 860K is based on the steamroller architecture which also powers some of AMD's more recent APUs including the A10-7850K. In addition to a 3.7 GHz steamroller chip, the A10-7850K also includes integrated R7 graphics. Comparing the CPU performance of the A10-7850K and 860K shows that the two processors perform almost identically. A key comparable for the 860K is Intel's G3258 which is an unlocked dual core Pentium. Comparing the G3258 and X4 860K shows that the G3258 leads by as much as 70% for dual and single core workloads but the 860K outperforms the G3258 by around 20% on multi-core workloads. The G3258 wins hands down for Desktop computing which is heavily single and dual core dominated but for some (relatively rare) gaming workloads the X4 860K will outperform the G3258. [Mar '15 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback