Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100001405WOF
AMD
$110

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.9GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

 $110 

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.6GHz, Bulldozer.
Release date: Q4 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 32,537 user samples
66 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 103% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 103% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
32,471 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 58% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 58%
SPEED RANK: 783rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
114 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+121%
51.4 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.6 Pts +4% 76.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
223 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+300%
55.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
430 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+333%
99.2 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
790 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+416%
153 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,284 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+713%
158 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
84.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
232 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+249%
66.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
463 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+273%
124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
909 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+376%
191 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,430 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+645%
192 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,052,293 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
117 % Much better value.
+77%
66.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 53 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$247 $110 Much cheaper.
+55%
Age
Newest
3 Months Hugely more recent.
+98%
157 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
4 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+88%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.9 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+8%
3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.4 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+42%
3.8 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,752 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+798%
195 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,573 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+889%
159 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen5 Bulldozer
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-4100 is an inexpensive entry level quad-core processor. It was released in Q4 of 2011 and at the time was AMD’s budget chip on its latest Bulldozer architecture. Its base clock speed of 3.6 GHz boosts to 3.8 GHz in turbo mode and with appropriate cooling can be over-clocked to speeds of 4.9 GHz. Even though these numbers appear impressive, the real world effective speed only averages 59. This should be fine for general computing and even gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. It’s the FX-4100’s single-core performance which lets it down when compared to similarly priced Intel processors such as the Core i3-3225. Since the majority of daily computing relies single core performance typical desktop users will find better value elsewhere. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback