Today's hottest deals

Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsrock B650M Pro RS WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M Pro RS WiFi
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '24 at 00:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X-$279
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 222
2-Core 412
123% 237 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,295
118% 992 Pts
64-Core 1711
106% 1711 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
ASRock(1849 5238) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 266
Parallax 550
208% 357 fps
MRender 418
Gravity 228
Splatting 350
272% 332 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 204%
Great: 214%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,235
Write 4577
Mixed 3,197
894% 4,003 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 97
366% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 2,371
DQ Write 1,972
DQ Mixed 2,162
1,622% 2,169 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 55.1
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.8
SC Write 60.6
SC Mixed 51.9
152% 53.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 152%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0C04 SAMSUNG
Typical B650M Pro RS WiFi Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 254%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M Pro RS WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback