Performance Results

Gaming 242%
Desktop 104%
Workstation 241%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics254% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 14:11
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$177
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 69.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 355
105% 203 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1,160
111% 917 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
MSI(1462 E13D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
254% Outstanding
Lighting 373
Reflection 376
Parallax 443
304% 397 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 305
Splatting 236
268% 343 fps
Poor: 229%
This bench: 254%
Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 770 523 498 510 685 604 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,110
Write 1555
Mixed 1,437
SusWrite 598
318% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 65.9
213% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,856
DQ Write 1,513
DQ Mixed 1,608
1,225% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 262%
Great: 346%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
4GB free
Firmware: 1.3.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 92.4
Mixed 91.4
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 5.3
63% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 48.5
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 95.5
60% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 61%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
569GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2968 3203 3279 1437 1448 1465 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,121
Write 3,579
Mixed 2,841
SusWrite 2,300
616% 2,710 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 76.1
249% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,878
DQ Write 1,388
DQ Mixed 1,631
1,220% 1,632 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 375%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 48.1
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 35.6
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 41.3
119% 41.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 131%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 198%
Desktop 117%
Workstation 201%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback