UserBenchmark: AMD FX-8350 vs Ryzen 5 7600X

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD100-100000593WOF

BUY • $205

AMDFD8350FRHKBOX

BUY • $130

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 319,507 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

6,311 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 101% Great: 120%

SPEED RANK: 41^st / 1441

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 113%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

313,196 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)

Poor: 48% Great: 68%

SPEED RANK: 567^th / 1441

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 47%

Yacht


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		110 %	Hugely faster effective speed. +82%		60.8 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	81.7 Pts	+1%	81 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	202 Pts	Hugely faster single-core speed. +214%	64.3 Pts
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	392 Pts	Hugely faster dual-core speed. +221%	122 Pts
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	746 Pts	Hugely faster quad-core speed. +238%	221 Pts
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	1166 Pts	Hugely faster octa-core speed. +242%	341 Pts


Memory OC Memory Latency	91.2 Pts		91.8 Pts	+1%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	213 Pts	Hugely faster OC single-core speed. +191%	73.3 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	419 Pts	Hugely faster OC dual-core speed. +193%	143 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	821 Pts	Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +223%	254 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	1254 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +216%	397 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,816,558 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.31 %	Hugely higher market share. +520%	0.05 %
Value Value For Money	120 %	Much better value. +60%	74.9 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	82 %	Much more popular. +44%	57 %
Price Price (score)	$205		$130	Much cheaper. +37%


Age Newest	19 Months	Hugely more recent. +86%	139 Months
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	105 Watts	More energy efficient. +16%	125 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		8 cores	Much higher core count. +33%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads	Much higher thread count. +50%	8 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	5 nm	Hugely newer manufacturing. +84%	32 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	4.7 GHz	Faster base frequency. +17%	4 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	5.3 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +26%	4.2 GHz
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1504 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +266%	411 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1429 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +305%	353 Pts


Series CPU Architecture	Zen4	Piledriver
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM5	AM3+
Graphics Integrated Graphics	RDNA2	None

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. ^{[Sep '22 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. ^{[May '13 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback