AMD100-100000159BOX
AMD100-100000591WOF

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q2 2020.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,841 user samples
15,293 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 69% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 242nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
4,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 97% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 6.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 97% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
79.7 % 112 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
77.3 Pts 80.7 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
137 Pts 207 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+51%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
257 Pts 406 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+58%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
443 Pts 766 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+73%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
662 Pts 1369 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+107%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.6 Pts 91.9 Pts +5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
147 Pts 217 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+48%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
289 Pts 433 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+50%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
500 Pts 843 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+69%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
748 Pts 1618 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+116%
Market Share
Based on 67,783,099 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.28 % Hugely higher market share.
+833%
Value
Value For Money
94.4 % 112 % Better value.
+18%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 70 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 Much cheaper.
+46%
$279
Age
Newest
47 Months 19 Months Much more recent.
+60%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 4.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 5.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+26%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
753 Pts 1996 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+165%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
677 Pts 1873 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+177%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3300X is a 4-core Ryzen CPU. Priced at just $120 USD, it offers far better value to gamers than all the previous Ryzen CPUs. This is great news for potential buyers, but bad luck for gamers that recently spent nearly three times more on the 8-core 3700X. The reduction from eight to four cores results in more efficient caching and higher boost clocks. AMD’s marketing has abruptly broken from the firmly established “moar cores” mantra to a conveniently realistic: four cores are actually okay. Shifting goalposts this quickly reveals an unhealthy focus on first time buyers and a brazen disregard for existing customers. Sales tactics aside, unfortunately the 3300X remains constrained by architectural latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). Comparing an overclocked 3300X pegged at 4425 MHz to a stock Intel Core i3-10100 running at 4100 MHz shows that the i3-10100 delivers better gaming performance in four out of five games. The 10100 also includes an iGPU with QuickSync hardware encoding. Since additional cores make little difference to gamers, there are no significant upgrades beyond the 3300X in the Ryzen product stack. In order to achieve better gaming performance, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier Intel CPU. Despite the barrage of anonymous hearsay pushed on social media, users will be hard pressed to find actual use cases that favor the 3300X over the i3-10100, especially when the 10100 is not handicapped by 2666 MHz RAM. Gamers are bottlenecked by the Ryzen architecture and desktop users need integrated graphics. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback