AMDFD9590FHHKWOF
AMD100-100000593WOF

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.7GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 32,420 user samples
26,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 4.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 532nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
6,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
63.1 % 110 % Much faster effective speed.
+75%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.4 Pts 81.7 Pts +0%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
70.6 Pts 202 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+186%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 392 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+195%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
243 Pts 746 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+207%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
390 Pts 1166 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+199%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.1 Pts +1% 91.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
82.3 Pts 213 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+159%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
160 Pts 419 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+162%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
294 Pts 821 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+179%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
482 Pts 1254 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+160%
Market Share
Based on 67,775,859 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.3 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,900%
Value
Value For Money
61.9 % 122 % Hugely better value.
+97%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % 82 % Much more popular.
+46%
Price
Price (score)
$298 $195 Much cheaper.
+35%
Age
Newest
129 Months 19 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 Watts 105 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+52%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 5 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+84%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5 GHz 5.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+6%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
479 Pts 1504 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+214%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
396 Pts 1429 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+261%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback