AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 168,554 user samples
2,914 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 33% Base clock 3.3 GHz
Poor: 33% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 418th / 1176
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
165,640 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 65% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 1176
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
43.2 % 74.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+73%
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
67.9 Pts 111 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+63%
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
233 Pts 421 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+81%
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
403 Pts 906 Pts Hugely faster multi-core speed.
+125%
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
82.7 Pts 120 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+45%
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
308 Pts 473 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+54%
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
537 Pts 1013 Pts Hugely faster OC multi-core speed.
+89%
Market Share
Based on 18,675,640 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 3.45 % Insanely higher market share.
+17,150%
Value
Value For Money
55.4 % 101 % Hugely better value.
+82%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % 101 % Much more popular.
+77%
Price
Price (score)
$150 $131 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
58 Months 15 Months Much more recent.
+74%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+62%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.4 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+10%
3.9 GHz
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
88 Pts 115 Pts Much faster single-core int speed.
+31%
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
77.6 Pts 125 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
+61%
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
326 Pts 455 Pts Much faster quad-core int speed.
+40%
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
288 Pts 493 Pts Much faster quad-core fp speed.
+71%
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
551 Pts 983 Pts Much faster multi-core int speed.
+78%
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
469 Pts 1024 Pts Hugely faster multi-core fp speed.
+118%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for money, especially for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $199Nvidia GTX 1070 $391Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $251Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i9-9900K $470Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback