COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX
AMD100-100000589WOF
▲ 542,883 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

VS
▲ 59773 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Effective Speed 
+96%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,630 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
33,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 641st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
5,431 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 125% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 97% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 97% Great: 125%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		57.8 % 113 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+96%
Average Score 
+248%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		80.6 Pts +0% 80.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		58.8 Pts 210 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+257%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		108 Pts 409 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+279%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		191 Pts 782 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+309%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		298 Pts 1,475 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+395%
Overclocked Score 
+211%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.4 Pts 92.3 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		70.4 Pts 220 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+212%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		134 Pts 435 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+225%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		238 Pts 856 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+260%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		370 Pts 1,683 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+355%
Value & Sentiment 
+212%
Market Share
Based on 68,991,740 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.02 % 0.2 % Hugely higher market share.
+900%
Value
Value For Money 		86 % 105 % Better value.
+22%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		54 % 59 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score) 		$65 Hugely cheaper.
+82% 		$368
Nice To Haves 
+216%
Age
Newest 		122 Months 25 Months Much more recent.
+80%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		95 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+44% 		170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		32 nm 5 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+84%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.2 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+47%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4 GHz 5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+40%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		378 Pts 2,974 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+687%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		305 Pts 2,736 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+797%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Piledriver Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3+ AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None RDNA2
Conclusion 
Average Bench 57.8%
Average Bench 113%

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
33,199
5,431
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback