The Athlon II X4 750K is not about outright speed, it's about value for money. As a result of its relatively weak single core performance, which is around 26% slower than the 3225, the 750K scores in the bottom 34% for real world consumer performance. The Intel competitors offer far snappier response times but only if you are prepared to pay around 70% more. If you are on a super tight budget the 750K may well be the best option but for most consumer orientated tasks it's probably worth paying a little more. [Jun '13CPUPro]
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.