Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '24 at 15:51
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-14100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 65.6
1-Core 191
2-Core 352
105% 203 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 899
95% 759 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
MSI(1462 8121) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 52.1
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 49.7
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 52.7
42% 51.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Origin Inception TLC830 Pro NVME 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,142
Write 2,159
Mixed 1,548
366% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 71.8
237% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 1,063
800% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 261%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
667GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 19.9
116% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2356CS.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24" 1280 720 CMT2401 GA241
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $330Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback