Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '23 at 21:39
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 645 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 769 48% 769 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 28.1 26% 29.9 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 25.7 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$77 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 410 407 391 370 337 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 407 Write 447 Mixed 372 SusWrite 388 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 34.2 114% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 294 220% 295 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 105%
WDC WD6003FFBX-68MU3N0 6TB 482 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5TB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 232 227 235 234 230 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 208 Write 204 Mixed 102 SusWrite 232 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 1.2 9% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 3.9 DQ Mixed 3.9 3% 3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$84 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 157 159 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 184 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 158 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 112%
Drobo B800i 4.5TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4TB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.9 21 21 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 88.4 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 18.1 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 234% 2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 35%
Drobo B800i 4.5TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4TB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.7 19 20 24 23 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 51 Write 61.8 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 16.7 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 226% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 35%
Drobo B800i 5.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4.5TB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.9 18 19 24 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 75.4 Write 81.3 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 16.4 42% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1 268% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 29%
Drobo B800i 5.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.1 19 20 25 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 81.7 Write 94 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 17.8 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 280% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 29%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 0 0.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 114 Write 117 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 0.2 92% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 47%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 104 Write 94.5 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 0.2 81% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 47%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 5.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 166 Write 117 Mixed 87.1 SusWrite 0.2 110% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 77%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 71 73 74 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 65.1 Write 60.4 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 72.7 86% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 44%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 71 73 74 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 86.4 Write 86.1 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 72.9 108% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 138 Write 148 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 0.4 114% 91 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FA1 8x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	111% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 42.5 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 22.7 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0D45 C27F398

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	233x
Core i7-5930KIntel $116Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	105x
Core i7-6800KIntel $90Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $449Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	41x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	19x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $1,058

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400