Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110622
Uptime26.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 03:45
Run Duration532 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 303
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.12 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
465GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 88.4
Mixed 42.4
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.32
87% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
396GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 107
Write 112
Mixed 62.1
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$75
50GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 70.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 49.3
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.36
107% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 26.3
Mixed 11.6
28% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.44
68% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 47%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.2
34% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.28
81% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
952GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 24
34% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.25
79% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
251GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 26.3
Mixed 14.6
29% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.34
63% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 47%
hp USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID b107
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 5.67
Mixed 5.72
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.22
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
20% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback