Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$330
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 85.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,228
109% 921 Pts
64-Core 2,147
133% 2,147 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 194
Reflection 202
Parallax 218
158% 205 fps
Gravity 190
Splatting 118
132% 154 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,216
Write 2127
Mixed 1825
458% 2,056 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 75.2
241% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 971
740% 998 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 445%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
102GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 480 482 482 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 503
Write 484
Mixed 379
SusWrite 482
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 45.2
157% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
78GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 415 203 154 165 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 499
Write 462
Mixed 409
SusWrite 259
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 55
182% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 357
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 132%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
724GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 0.8
95% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
123% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 101 102 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 182
Write 92.3
Mixed 108
SusWrite 102
152% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
564GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 103 100 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 101
133% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 173 171 171 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 172
Write 88.3
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 172
172% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $2,144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback