Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 24.1 1-Core 56.4 2-Core 64.3 28% 48.3 Pts	4-Core 73 8-Core 63.7 9% 68.3 Pts	64-Core 49.2 3% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39F3) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 6.3 3% 5.33 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD 2,686 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900615 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 238 71 74 182 210 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 159 Write 76 Mixed 175 SusWrite 162 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 14.4 47% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 134 101% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 105%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 10 11 13 20 21 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 154 Write 7.5 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 13.4 37% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M4S08S681JGGG39-12 1x8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 292 14% 292 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	104x
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 28%, 3,903 samples	59x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	38x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	104x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	59x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	38x

SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	11x
MTFDDAK256TDL 256GBMicronBench 84%, 741 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GBRamaxelBench 26%, 4,120 samples	46x
RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 6,442 samples	29x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	26x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16