TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G

▲ 5012 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q3 2018.

Average Bench: 28.5% (1354th of 1445)

Based on 3,903 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00670F00 Model: AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Poor: 11%Average: 28.5% Great: 39%
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G averaged 71.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 47.4Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 38.1Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G is 27.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 59.3Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 59.4Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,903 samples)
Rank 135428.5%
Min Avg Max
14.4 Memory 47.4 67.5
17.7 1-Core 38.1 49.1
23.7 2-Core 56.1 75
30.8% 47.2 Pts
Min Avg Max
30.9 4-Core 57.3 74.7
34.3 8-Core 59.4 74.7
7.75% 58.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
29.9 64-Core 59.3 74.3
3.7% 59.3 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
35.5% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 67.4
38% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 68.5
9% 68.5 Pts
64-Core 67.7
4% 67.7 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
34.2% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 33.1
27% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 60.8
8-Core 52.8
8% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
33.2% Below average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 44.6
32% 46 Pts
4-Core 50.6
8-Core 50.8
7% 50.7 Pts
64-Core 66.3
4% 66.3 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
32.7% Below average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 53.6
33% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 52.3
7% 52.4 Pts
64-Core 68.1
4% 68.1 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
32.2% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 51.3
33% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 51.5
8-Core 51.5
7% 51.5 Pts
64-Core 65.2
4% 65.2 Pts
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
31.2% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 41
2-Core 31.7
30% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 59.3
8-Core 60
8% 59.7 Pts
64-Core 65.4
4% 65.4 Pts
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
24% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 43.3
26% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 46.7
8-Core 50.5
6% 48.6 Pts
64-Core 43.5
3% 43.5 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
23.5% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 57.5
28% 44.2 Pts
4-Core 59.2
8-Core 60.6
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
3,903 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,871,569 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G Builds (Compare 1,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

CPU
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 28%, 3,903 samples1x
GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples292x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples286x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples171x
SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples44x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples43x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples37x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples176x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples88x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples69x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i7-11700K

1445 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback