TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G

▲ 5014 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2018.

Average Bench: 28.4% (1314th of 1404)

Based on 7,071 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00670F00 Model: AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Poor: 13%Average: 28.4% Great: 40%
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G averaged 71.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 46.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 42.5Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G is 27.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 64.5Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 65.5Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 7,071 samples)
Rank 131428.4%
Min Avg Max
16.9 Memory 46.2 68.4
18.6 1-Core 42.5 56.8
26.9 2-Core 61.7 86
32% 50.1 Pts
Min Avg Max
32 4-Core 63.4 86.3
36.5 8-Core 65.5 85.3
8.6% 64.5 Pts
Min Avg Max
32.9 64-Core 64.5 85.4
4% 64.5 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
31.3% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 57.7
34% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 58.6
8% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 56
4% 56 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
20% Very poor
Memory 33.1
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 42.7
23% 35.7 Pts
4-Core 38.7
8-Core 55.9
6% 47.3 Pts
64-Core 53.4
3% 53.4 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 23.7
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 53.5
22% 38 Pts
4-Core 56.9
8-Core 58.2
8% 57.6 Pts
64-Core 52.1
3% 52.1 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
13.5% Very poor
Memory 17.4
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 30
18% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 43.7
7% 50.9 Pts
64-Core 56.7
4% 56.7 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
13.1% Very poor
Memory 16.3
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 51.5
20% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 56.5
8-Core 61.5
8% 59 Pts
64-Core 49.1
3% 49.1 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
6.2% Terrible
Memory 2.35
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 49.7
14% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 60
8% 58.5 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
7,071 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 60,336,904 CPUs tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81N3

CPU
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples173x
GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples171x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples72x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples27x
SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples31x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples24x
RTOTJ256VGD2MYX 256GBBench 60%, 211 samples15x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples109x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples39x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 31%, 5,641 samples30x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2023 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,312

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

17 months ago.

absolute clunker of a cpu. I figured I could squeeze a little more performance out by adding an SSD and more ram. I was wrong! I cheeped out way too much, my 4 year old i5 laptop I replaced performed better in every way. Even daily tasks are a chore.

RUS-User
Avatar level
4,582

Terrible

3 years ago.

Tree Trunk for real. Windows Task Manager consumes 25% of this CPU, worst buy ever.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i7-9700K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

1404 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback