Average Bench: 27.1% (1387th of 1457)

Based on 15,014 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00670F00, 00670F00178BFBFF Model: AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Poor: 9%Average: 27.1% Great: 39%
Gaming 27%
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 19%

Very poor average bench

The AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) averaged 72.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Memory Latency 42.3Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 47.3Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) is 29.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Multi Core Speed 70.6Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 71.9Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 15,014 samples)
Min Avg Max
9.53 Memory 42.3 63.5
20.5 1-Core 47.3 69.2
29.8 2-Core 67.5 103
32.5% 52.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
36.8 4-Core 69.8 103
39.2 8-Core 71.9 102
9.45% 70.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
30.3 64-Core 70.6 102
4.4% 70.6 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 58.8
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 94.5
44% 72 Pts
4-Core 85.5
8-Core 93.7
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 93.3
6% 93.3 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 57.7
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 57.1
38% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 70.6
10% 71.4 Pts
64-Core 70.1
4% 70.1 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Memory 55.2
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 76.6
36% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 77.8
10% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Memory 48
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 57.8
32% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 69.1
8-Core 69
9% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 95.2
6% 95.2 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 41
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 71.3
33% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 73.2
10% 72.1 Pts
64-Core 66.4
4% 66.4 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 35.3
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 67.6
30% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 69.1
8-Core 68
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 67.6
4% 67.6 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 17.8
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 23
12% 18.8 Pts
4-Core 27.6
8-Core 29.4
4% 28.5 Pts
64-Core 28
2% 28 Pts
15,014 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,220,390 CPUs tested

Typical A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) Builds (Compare 1,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx


Popular A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

23 months ago.

Perfect for an email machine. Spreadsheets is pushing its' capabilities.


15 months ago.

500 dollars for something that cant out perform an i3 4th gen


3 years ago.

It's great for emulation laptop, cheap and crappy. Runs most major emulators including ppsspp. Tested on wipeout pure, runs playably with frameskip of 1. It's slightly better processor than my androidTV, which ran wipeout pure poorly with glitches and not at full speed even with framskipping


1 month ago.

For low-end she really brings a good performance 'IF' Windows are really light back in 2018.


3 years ago.

Should be illegal to sell such a bad processor.


2 years ago.

igpu is bottlenecking its own cpu

1457 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback