Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A0
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 06:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Memory 11.4
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 47.4
17% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 39.9
8-Core 53.5
6% 46.7 Pts
64-Core 52.1
3% 52.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84A0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.06
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 139 135 139 138 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 375
Write 327
Mixed 315
SusWrite 152
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 28
88% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 93.5
82% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 391
10% 391 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback