PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H310MHP (all builds) |
Memory | 21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191230 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '22 at 03:45 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
NX-256 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN8878
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 341 355 372 372 370 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown KS2666D4P12016G 0813 TYA4U2666D19081C 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
|
74.4%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 357x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 285x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 134x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 54x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $270 |