Today's hottest deals

DEXP Mars E295

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemDEXP Mars E295  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H310M PRO-VDH PLUS
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 12:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 440
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 50.5
44% 53.9 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 38.5
40% 50.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA351-6007000 512GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 342 105 50 63 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 389
Write 300
Mixed 307
SusWrite 157
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 18.4
96% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 38.4
93% 192 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mars E295 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: DEXP Mars E295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback