Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 05 '23 at 01:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 235
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 434
61% 449 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 512 511 513 496 513 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,606
Write 588
Mixed 721
SusWrite 493
188% 852 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 51.2
156% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 557
435% 614 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 172%
Great: 318%
WDC WDS960G2G0C-00AJM0 960GB
383GB free
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 598 372 366 347 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 744
Mixed 729
SusWrite 488
162% 725 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 39.2
138% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 566
436% 606 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 138%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback