Today's hottest deals

Asus P5G41T-M LX3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 11:55
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 95.3
34% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 152
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
XFX(1682 400A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1
2% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.28.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 164 167 171 162 150 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33% Below average
Read 199
Write 180
Mixed 167
SusWrite 158
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 11
43% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 23.7
25% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33%
Great: 240%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
346GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 70.4
Write 57.3
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 74.2
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M LX3 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $47
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback