Today's hottest deals

Asus P5QL-ASUS-SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5QL-ASUS-SE  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081204
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 31.2
34% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 32.5
8-Core 44.7
5% 38.6 Pts
64-Core 43.2
3% 43.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Zotac(19DA 7046) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 6
Parallax 1
1% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 98 126 113 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL-ASUS-SE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-ASUS-SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback