Average Bench: 46.5% (831st of 1307)

more Based on 53,042 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000006FB, , BFEBFBFF00010676, BFEBFBFF000006F7, 0000000000000000, BFEBFBFF00010677, 1FABFBFF000006FB, BFEBFBFF0001067A, 00050400000607D0, 1F8BFBFF000006FB Models: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 3.0GHz

The Core2 Quad Q6600 is over 7 years old which is a lot of processor lifetimes! This particular model has been included in the group test simply as a reference because of its exceptional popularity back when it was at the forefront of technological advance. The Q6600's four physical cores demonstrate exceptional overclocking capacity and often achieve in excess of 40% performance increases. Modern Quad core processors offer nearly three times more performance on both single and multi-core workloads. There have also been lots of non-processing related improvements in the platform over the last 7 years which include SATA 600 MB/s, USB 3.0 PCIe and more. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

Poor: 37%Average: 46.5% Great: 55%
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Below average average bench

The Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 averaged 53.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 68.6Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 37.4Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 is just 17.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 146Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 145Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 53,042 samples)
Min Avg Max
55.3 Memory 68.6 78.9
25.2 1-Core 37.4 47.3
50.4 2-Core 74.9 94.3
40.5% 60.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
87.8 4-Core 143 187
96.5 8-Core 145 187
19.6% 144 Pts
Min Avg Max
99.3 64-Core 146 187
9.8% 146 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 70.3
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 74.7
41% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 149
10% 149 Pts
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Memory 66.4
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 66.9
39% 57 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 150
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 149
10% 149 Pts
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 51.7
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 74.4
35% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 143
10% 143 Pts
53,042 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 42,186,882 CPUs tested.

 Prices

MSRP ≈ $130 @ launch in Jan '07
AmazonUS $1905 months
Send price feedback
Typical Core2 Quad Q6600 Builds (Compare 33,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $222

Popular Core2 Quad Q6600 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q6600 (8M Cache, 2.40 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB)
Code NameKentsfield
Launch DateQ1'07
Processor NumberQ6600
# of Cores4
Cache8 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography65 nm
VID Voltage Range0.8500V-1.500V
Recommended PriceN/A
Clock Speed2.4 GHz
Bus Speed1066 MHz FSB
Max TDP105 W
FSB ParityNo

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsNo

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Demand Based SwitchingNo

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets SupportedLGA775
Processing Die Size286 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors582 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechNo

 Comments

Designed to handle massive compute and visualization workloads...

Models: BX80562Q6600, HH80562PH0568M

Added 7 years ago.

Terrible

2 months ago.

Its slow not very good i would suggest getting a core i5-10210u instead way better


Excellent

4 months ago.

'cause it runned my system 2007-2017 and made it well af


Terrible

1 month ago.

excellent !! if you want to play modern games find a very good gpu ,and you are okey !!!!


Excellent

15 days ago.

Might the best overclocker CPU. Still praised for great OC potential and may the best enthusiast Intel CPU ever.


Poor

2 months ago.

one of the best processors from intel


Good

2 months ago.

Easy to OC a old Processor so much good. Not the best one. But is of the best for the 775


Good

11 months ago.

Great for overclock runs most games fine


Good

4 months ago.

Very decent cpu. Bought one refurbished for 1 dollar.


Excellent

2 months ago.

Honestly, perhaps my most succesful buy 10 years ago. I still use it with windows 10 (not for games), and it still runs great. Even if the system is old, if you to it an SSD, It can easily cover all basic needs. Thanks to that i will propably change the system next year (a rysen 3000 series most likely), not because of the processors performance but the mobos limitations.


Good

5 months ago.

Reliable and powerful. 10 years of heavy use.


Good

3 months ago.

all game on max settings what to say else


Excellent

10 months ago.

Legendary CPU, still after 12 years more than adequate for most tasks


Excellent

14 months ago.

Bought it in 2010, Ran it at 3,33 Ghz. Now looking for cheap upgrade. (probably Xeon e5450 for socket 775 for $20 and overclock it to 3,8 Ghz) Awesome processor. For basic tasks it still holds. (after 13 years, never in history was time, when you could use 13 year old processor (imagine, in 1998 using first IBM PC/AT 286 at 8 Mhz from around 1984/1985... you would not even run Windows 95/98 with it ... now you can use 13 year old processor for Windows and all basic programs and even medium tasks (with 4 cores) - only heavy editing, computing, and demanding newest games are impossible.)

Info  www.userbenchmark.com/...

Info  www.userbenchmark.com/...

overclocked Q6600 at 3.5 Ghz results:


Terrible

7 years ago.


Excellent

2 years ago.

I just replaced my q6600 after 10 years. It ran at 3.6 Ghz for about 8 years. It is amazing piece of engineering. I replaced it with i5 7600k and there is realy no significant difference in everyday tasks.


Good

12 months ago.

This CPU is garbage for anything more than web browsing. 1/5


Excellent

3 years ago.

Still works after 8 long hard years !


Terrible

3 years ago.

low perfomance for that price


Good

16 months ago.

Probably the best CPU Intel have ever released.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Doing the business since late 2007, GPU's bear the brunt of rendering these days anyway...the ol' gal's got legs in her yet!


Excellent

23 months ago.

Unbeatable Price to Performance ratio.


Very good

4 years ago.

For the price this is excelent cpu.


Good

2 years ago.

It’s been more than 11 years. This CPU still holds up to mordern Low power laptop 2c/4t CPUs when overclocked. Still has a little lift left in it.


Good

18 months ago.

Legendary. Still commonplace in workplaces and schools, this nearly decade old piece of hardware still breezes through Windows 10, websurfing, and even multitasking. Add an SSD and you can still breathe life into a system with this chip. Just maybe pass on gaming.


Excellent

2 years ago.

Rock solid CPU even after 12 years.


Good

5 years ago.

8 years and counting...


Very good

5 years ago.

I got it in 2008 and it have worked wonders since then. And as operating systems started using multiple cores more and more it has kept up surprisingly well. Now rather slow. But with 8gb of RAM and a ssd things are still working.


Very good

3 years ago.

I have it and love it, it can achieve great clocks


Excellent

3 years ago.

Using Since 2008 Still Runs Fine, Just changed motherboard once for 12$ from intel to asrock and now i overclock it to at 3GHz


Excellent

19 months ago.

I use it with a Gt730, an SSD and 8GB Ram. Nothing to envy to modern PCs for eveyday tasks.


Your
opinion?
1307 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback