Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 50.7% (801st of 1468)

Based on 16,719 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF0001067A Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz
Poor: 39%Average: 50.7% Great: 58%
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Average average bench

The Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 averaged 49.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 72.1Pts
Avg. Dual Core Speed 92.3Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 is just 19.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 176Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 175Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 16,719 samples)
Min Avg Max
55.1 Memory 72.1 80.9
32.7 1-Core 46.2 58
63.4 2-Core 92.3 115
45% 70.2 Pts
Min Avg Max
99.7 4-Core 172 226
116 8-Core 175 226
23.2% 173 Pts
Min Avg Max
122 64-Core 176 224
10.9% 176 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 88
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 118
56% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 225
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 75
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 93.9
46% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 179
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 72.8
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 93.3
46% 71 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 180
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 61.1
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 94.7
41% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 68.4
1-Core 41
2-Core 85.8
42% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 119
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
16,719 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,048,897 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

AmazonUS $17020 months
Send price feedback
Typical Core2 Quad Q9650 Builds (Compare 963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $195

Popular Core2 Quad Q9650 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9650 (12M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB)
Code NameYorkfield
Launch DateQ3'08
Processor NumberQ9650
# of Cores4
Cache12 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography45 nm
VID Voltage Range0.8500V-1.3625V
Recommended Price$339.00
Clock Speed3 GHz
Bus Speed1333 MHz FSB
Max TDP95 W
FSB ParityNo

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsNo

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
Demand Based SwitchingNo

Package

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets SupportedLGA775
Processing Die Size214 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors820 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

12 days ago.

4 Cores of thunder the ultimate 775 CPU, when you can't afford a real pc but still have an old office pc lying around whip out the GT 1030 and Q9650 and show those modern gamers you don't suck even with your DDR2 Ram and Crappy 200 watt power supply


Poor

2 years ago.

amazing price for a pc that tou might have lying around


Poor

8 months ago.

You can actually use this to build a gaming PC for under 300 CDN if you know how to put together the parts yourself everything you need is on aliexpress and amazon. GPU is like 60 bucks `16gbs of ram is like 75 the cpu is like 25 on aliexpress and in u have an old optiplex 778-0 thats your best bet throw a SSD in there and BANG good to go


Excellent

11 months ago.

Currently testing it on some old comp. Emerging Gentoo, It performs really well.


Excellent

3 years ago.

I've always used this CPU and it is very good.


Good

3 years ago.

Great value as an upgrade in an old PC.


Poor

9 months ago.

It is very good but only you have DDR3 Rams.


Good

3 years ago.

Pretty respectable CPU, similar to a 2nd gen or 3rd gen i3.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Old but gold. Still usable today so many years later.


Your
opinion?
1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback