Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory103 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 06:34
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$189
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 736
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 201
Parallax 230
171% 214 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 209
Splatting 167
171% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 780 858 850 834 840 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 678
Write 945
Mixed 557
SusWrite 790
168% 742 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 47.4
207% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 719
543% 732 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 170%
Great: 230%
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
109GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 386 464 456 455 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 467
Mixed 338
SusWrite 415
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 37.2
144% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 311
236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
223GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 216 232 239 244 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 391
Write 280
Mixed 283
SusWrite 226
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 38.8
151% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 257
199% 272 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 95%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$30
967GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 72.2
Write 75.2
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 100
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.4
132% 46 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $1,058
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback