Today's hottest deals

HP 550-003no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-003no  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 12:52
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 69.5
33% 52.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 125
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 47.3
28% 39 fps
MRender 49.5
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.1
35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 189 215 200 208 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 317
Write 218
Mixed 248
SusWrite 201
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 21.4
75% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 179
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
929GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 204 199 207 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 162
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 200
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.1 8.5 7.4 9.3 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 9
18% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 30% 61 320 252 120 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
History: Score 48: 6R 3G 9B | Score 48: 5R 5G 8B
Typical 550-003no Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-003no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback