Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '22 at 00:12
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 127 47% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 181 26% 188 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.3% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 37.9 24% 33.2 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 32.1 30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 197 197 186 187 182 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 387 Write 343 Mixed 327 SusWrite 210 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 40.7 137% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 239 179% 239 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 507GB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 26 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 29.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 26.2 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.7 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 32.9 Write 30.1 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 3.9 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 200% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10- NMUD380D81-16 F3-12800CL10- NMUD380D81-16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	45x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	35x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	35x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	27x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389