Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 02:06
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 129
55% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 206
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 71.1
65% 77.1 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 65.6
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 243 216 193 211 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 371
Write 336
Mixed 299
SusWrite 220
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 41.2
135% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 248
186% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 124%
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB
232GB free
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 362 346 373 363 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 291
Write 334
Mixed 274
SusWrite 342
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 24.6
97% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 248
189% 255 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 103%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 114 112 110 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 109
154% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 114 112 110 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 154
Write 158
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 109
162% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
272% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
1GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.9 7 5.3 6.8 6.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Read 11
Write 4.2
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 6.5
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 7%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
6GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.6 0.7 2.5 3.6 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.1
5% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback