Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121022
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 121 58% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 286 32% 253 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.6% Above average	Lighting 72.9 Reflection 79.9 Parallax 71.2 59% 74.7 fps	MRender 75.3 Gravity 72.3 Splatting 63.7 57% 70.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 238 225 205 216 221 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 425 Write 387 Mixed 333 SusWrite 236 78% 345 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 46.8 155% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 238 178% 237 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 124%
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 222GB free Firmware: 3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 403 373 397 375 399 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 342 Write 392 Mixed 295 SusWrite 379 80% 352 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 28.7 104% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 254 194% 263 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 103%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 592GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 120 120 120 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 120 Write 121 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 117 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 62%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2.5TB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 26 25 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 26.6 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 25 36% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 27.6 Write 26.4 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 3.4 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 68%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 16GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 0 3 2.2 6 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 2.8 9% 8.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	72.3"	1280 701	TSB0206 TOSHIBA-TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-UD3 Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	109x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	62x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	94x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16