Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q PRO TURBO  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 20:41
Run Duration436 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 89.5
41% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 165
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Gigabyte(1458 21B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.56% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 7.5
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.9
9% 10 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 166 171 144 107 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 255
Write 232
Mixed 237
SusWrite 142
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 38.8
126% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 189
142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$37
131GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 117 110 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 120
Write 107
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 110
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
MB1000GCWCV 1TB
664GB free
Firmware: HPGC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 143 126 101 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 154
Write 160
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 123
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$60
4GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 51.8
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$96
13GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 27 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 15.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 27.2
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 4: 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 6% 63 111 83 60 0" 1440 900 Default
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 9: 0R 3G 0B | Score 4: 0R 0G 4B
Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $167Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $320Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback