Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

24 months ago, 24 months ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$38 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 169 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 334 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.62 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Lighting 12.8 Reflection 15 Parallax 10.4 10% 12.7 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 13.6 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 111 118 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 128 Write 104 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 117 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB 10GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.4 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 9 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	328x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	309x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	68x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155