Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q SE PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5Q SE PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090828
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 00:01
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 126
53% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 250
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 32.4
28% 35 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 28.9
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 16 90 51 49 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 250
Write 167
Mixed 185
SusWrite 65.6
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 18.7
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 39.1
42% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
22GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 71.2
Write 76.9
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 72.8
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q SE PLUS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback