Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200827
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration	338 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 72.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 292 91% 171 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,111 100% 846 Pts	64-Core 2,129 132% 2,129 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 64.6 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 88.2 53% 72.2 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 47.1 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 385GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 1263 1257 1253 1252 1250 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 2,428 Write 2,403 Mixed 1,726 SusWrite 1,300 441% 1,964 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 77.4 268% 99.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,134 DQ Write 807 DQ Mixed 929 705% 957 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 371%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 931GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 625 629 631 647 648 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 793 Write 635 Mixed 568 SusWrite 628 147% 656 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 61.2 204% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 666 DQ Mixed 837 604% 783 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 466GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2313 820 822 822 820 821 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,624 Write 2,424 Mixed 1,897 SusWrite 1,070 448% 2,004 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 96.8 313% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 764 DQ Mixed 924 696% 939 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 355%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 111 114 130 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 140 Write 132 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 114 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 193 193 196 195 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 147 Mixed 82.7 SusWrite 192 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 113%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 716GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 138 138 136 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 119 Write 97.9 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 136 140% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 30.7 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 30.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $92Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)