PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150324 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 30 '21 at 22:29 |
Run Duration | 370 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 36 1.8 3.9 1.8 1.3 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 141 143 144 143 MB/s
|
80%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
47GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 64 65 65 64 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Asmt 2115 240GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.8 7 6.9 7 6.9 MB/s
|
4.12%
Terrible
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
35GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
|
8.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
366GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.8 MB/s
|
9.65%
Terrible
|
|||
ACTIONS HS USB FlashDisk 64GB
58GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.1 2.3 1.9 3.4 3.5 MB/s
|
6.69%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 685x |
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 593x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |